ABSTRACT
Objective:To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) plus surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) plus surgery in the treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Methods:Clinical controlled trials of comparing the treatment of NCRT plus surgery with NCT plus surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were electronically searched from the databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, WanFang and VIP from the inception of databases to January, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened the literatures, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. And then, a meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.Results:A total of 8 clinical control studies were included, including 995 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the NCT group, the R 0 resection rate was significantly higher ( OR=2.14, 95% CI: 1.03-4.45, P=0.040) and the pathological complete response (pCR) rate was significantly higher ( OR=4.19, 95% CI: 1.71-10.28, P=0.002) in the NCRT group. The incidence of postoperative complications ( OR=1.37, 95% CI: 0.76-2.48, P=0.300) and the risk of perioperative death ( OR=1.28, 95% CI: 0.58-2.83, P=0.54) were not significantly different between two groups. The long-term survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the NCRT group was significantly better compared with that in the NCT group ( HR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.64-0.92, P=0.005). Conclusions:Compared with NCT plus surgery for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, NCRT plus surgery has higher R 0 resection rate and pCR rate, does not significantly increase the risk of perioperative complications or perioperative death, and significantly improves the long-term survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the value of applicability of the 7th edition of UICC-AJCC esophageal and gastric cancer TNM staging system in the prognostic prediction of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (EGJ).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>During June 1, 2007 through Dec. 31, 2010, a total of 199 patients with adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (Siewert type II) underwent R0-intent resection from June 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2010 in our hospital. Their clinicopathological and survival data were retrospectively analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. They were restaged according to the 7th edition of UICC/AJCC TNM stage systems for esophageal adenocarcinoma and gastric cancer, respectively. Then the likelihood ratio chi-square test related to the Cox regression model and Akaike information criterion (AIC) were used for measuring goodness of fit for both staging systems.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>199 patients with Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma were identified in this study. Out of them, there were 162 males and 37 females. Their age range was from 38 to 79 years, with a median age of 62 years. 176 cases underwent transthoracic surgery, and other 23 cases underwent transabdominal surgery. TNM-EC and TNM-GC classified 4 patients to stage T1, 39 to T2, 139 to T3, and 17 to T4a, respectively, and classified 76 patients to stage N0, 58 to N1, 49 to N2, 16 to N3, respectively. The median follow-up period was 30 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 95.0%, 52.7% and 39.2%, respectively. Univariate analysis indicated that age at surgery (P = 0.009), surgical approach (P = 0.002), cell differentiation (P = 0.030), preoperative co-morbidity implications (P = 0.026), depth of tumor invasion (P < 0.001) and number of metastatic lymph nodes (P < 0.001) were significantly influencing factors of postoperative overall survival. Multivariate analysis showed that the independent prognostic factors for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction were only T stage, N stage and preoperative co-morbidity and morbidities according to the 7th edition of esophageal cancer or gastric cancer TNM staging systems. The AIC value was 961.4 for the 7th edition of esophageal adenocarcinoma caner staging system, and 965.7 for the 7th edition of gastric cancer staging system.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The UICC/AJCC 7th edition of esophageal adenocarcinoma cancer TNM classification staging system is superior to the 7th edition of gastric cancer TNM staging system for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction.</p>
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Adenocarcinoma , Diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms , Diagnosis , Esophagogastric Junction , Lymph Nodes , Lymphatic Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms , Survival RateABSTRACT
Objective To compare the applicability of the 7th and 6th editions of the UICC-AJCC esophageal cancer TNM staging systems for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (EGJ).Methods During June 2007 through December 2010,199 patients with EGJ adenocarcinoma(Siewert type Ⅱ) underwent R0-intent resection in our hospital.Their clinicopatholigical and survival data were retrospectively analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models.They were restaged according to the 7th and 6th UICC/AJCC TNM staging systems for esophageal cancer,respectively.Then the Akaike information criterion(AIC) was used for measuring goodness of fit of both staging systems.Results Among 199 patients,there were 162 males and 37 females.Univariate analysis indicated that age(P =0.009),surgical approach(P =0.002),cell differentiation (P =0.030),preoperative co-morbidity (P =0.026),depth of tumor invasion (P ＜ 0.000) and number of metastatic lymph nodes(P ＜ 0.000) were significant influencing factors on overall survival.Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the independent prognostic factors for EGJ adenocarcinoma were age,T stage,N stage and preoperative co-morbidity according to the 6th edition of esophageal cancer TNM staging system,and only T stage,N stage and preoperative co-morbidity according to the 7th edition of esophageal cancer TNM staging system.The AIC value was 961.4 for the 7th edition of esophageal cancer staging system and 972.4 for the 6th edition.Conclusion The 7th edition of UICC/AJCC esophageal cancer TNM classification is su perior to its 6th edition of esophageal cancer staging system for EGJ adenocarcinoma.
ABSTRACT
There are a variety of surgical treatments of advanced esophagogastric junction cancer,type Ⅰ 、Ⅱ mainly by transthoracic approach,part of the type Ⅱ by transabdominal approach,type Ⅲ mainly by left thoracoabdominal approach (LTA) or transabdominal.Intraoperative lymph node dissection is one of the most important factors which affect the postoperative survival rate.The cardia right lymph node (NO.1),the cardia left lymph node (NO.2),gastric lesser curvature (NO.3) and left gastric artery side (NO.7) should do regular cleaning.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the differences on lymphatic vessel density (LVD) among esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC),esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and normal esophageal tissues,and analyze the clinical significance.Methods Twenty samples of EAC,24 samples of ESCC and 20 cases of normal esophageal tissues were obtained at the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 2004 to January 2011.D2-40 was used for immunostaining of lymphatic vessels in EAC,and antibodies of D2-40 and Ki-67 were used together to detect proliferation of lymphatic vessels.The differences in the LVD among EAC,ESCC and normal esophageal tissues were analyzed.All data were analyzed using the analysis of variance or t test.Results D2-40 staining could identify the lymphatic vessels,and antibodies of D2-40 and Ki-67 could detect the proliferation of lymphatic vessels.The LVD of EAC,ESCC and normal esophageal tissues were (3.3 ± 1.7)/0.17 mm2,(4.6 ± 1.2)/0.17 mm2 and (3.8 ± 1.2)/0.17 mm2,respectively,with significant differences (F =5.44,P ＜0.05).The LVD of EAC was significantly lower than that of ESCC (t =3.074,P ＜ 0.05),while there was no significant difference in the LVD between the EAC and normal esophageal tissues (t =-1.022,P ＞ 0.05).There were significant differences in the LVD between the ESCC and normal esophageal tissues (t =2.395,P ＜ 0.05).There were significant differences in the LVD between EAC patients with deglutition discomfort and those with pain (t =3.092,P ＜ 0.05).There were significant differences in the LVD between EAC patients with course ＜6 months and those with course≥6 months (t =3.092,P ＜ 0.05).No statistical difference in clinicopathological parameters including gender,age,site of lesion,tumor diameter,pathological morphology,T stage,N stage,G stage,TNM clinical stage and lymph node metastasis were detected (t ＝ 1.130,1.020,F =0.082,t =0.799,F =0.692,t =0.694,1.820,0.353,0.969,0.969,P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions The LVD of EAC is lower than that of ESCC,but is similar to that of normal esophageal tissues.The LVD of EAC is correlated with the symptoms and course of patients.